It's Not the Party, It's the System
Cringely has a medical malpractice post that I don’t find terribly compelling, but here’s one of the comments on it:
Government trying to do anything for us is always bloated and inefficient because there are no checks and balances to keep costs down. None. Private business (up until the bailouts) must keep costs in check. Government doesn’t care about that. Why should they? So when costs go out of control they either tax us at higher rates and/or print more money.
It’s not the party that’s in power, it’s the system that it has evolved into. Have we not figured that out by now?
You might say that’s overly cynical but it seems about right to me. I’m certainly no fan of insurance companies; I think insurance in general is just about the biggest scam that there is. But I don’t consider it an improvement to replace [insurance system] or [other broken part of health-care system] with [corrupt politicians] or [additional layers of bureaucracy].
In the real world, you need to clearly identify the problem before you implement the solution. But not in government. It drives me crazy that these politicians are insisting on speed at the expense of correctness. When Obama insists we must pass health care reform ASAP, it makes lots of people suspicious. When Arlen Specter says that we have to "make judgments very fast" on a 1000-page bill that hardly anybody has even read, the crowd reacts instantly and angrily -- and rightly so. What sane person thinks that it’s a good idea to make quick judgments rather than careful decisions on such huge and important matters? Only politicians think that.
I’m all for reforming things that are broken. But we need to clearly identify those things before we can fix them. Ramming through a 1000-page bill is not a solution, and a government that would do such a thing is in itself broken, in a far more serious way than the health-care system is.